Figure 2. A, box plot and dot plot of centroid size labelling each clade as per Figure 1. Centroid size differences were clear only between the larger Antechinus subtropicus and the smaller A. stuartii (both mean comparisons between A. subtropicus and the two clades of A. stuartii were significant; P = 0.003), but not between A. stuartii south and A. stuartii north (P = 0.282). B, allometry plot consisting of centroid sizes versus shape scores obtained from the regression of shape on size (Drake & Klingenberg, 2008).