This paper contains two important results.
The one is the replication of my paper, “Anomalous rising of input current induced in the transformer of the inverter” ref. (5), by the different method of scaling up. Another result was so amazing that the electrical charge of initially charged in capacitor increased 6.60 times of the initial value. My paper of ref. (5) derived the proof of equation of the 3rd positive EMF. My assumption of the equation of the 3rd positive EMF is the function of second order time derivative of magnetic flux Φ. Magnetic flux Φ is expressed by the equation of Φ= L x I. Therefore I have to prove two equations are the function of the 3rd positive EMF, to prove the second order time derivative of magnetic flux, d2Φ/dt2 is the function of the 3rd positive EMF. The first equation is the second order time derivative of inductance L. the equation is expressed d2L /dt2. The second equation is the second order time derivative of current I. it is expressed d2I/dt2. So the 3rd positive EMF should be the function of these two terms. The former term d2L/dt2 was verified on the paper of NASA conference, ref. (2). The latter term d2I/dt2 was verified on the paper of ref. (5). The first result of this paper is the replication of ref. (5) by many times scaling up. The second result of the paper was unexpected and the most significant. The capacitor charge increased 6.60 times of initial charge of the capacitor after the discharging. The measuring data of the discharging current shows clearly long lasting discharging time beyond 250μsec. Although the capacitor discharging stopped at 6μsec after the discharging started. In other words, although even after the power source for the capacitor voltage became zero at 6μsec, the discharging current was still keeping to flow for more than 250μsec. The circuit current was remaining after the voltage of the power source was zero. Where did the extra charge and voltage come from?
However, the consideration of this phenomenon is not written on the paper. I suppose the spark discharging is the cause of the phenomenon. The long lasting discharging current might be flowed by the different type of the positive EMF caused by the electrical spark.The result ...
The one is the replication of my paper, “Anomalous rising of input current induced in the transformer of the inverter” ref. (5), by the different method of scaling up. Another result was so amazing that the electrical charge of initially charged in capacitor increased 6.60 times of the initial value. My paper of ref. (5) derived the proof of equation of the 3rd positive EMF. My assumption of the equation of the 3rd positive EMF is the function of second order time derivative of magnetic flux Φ. Magnetic flux Φ is expressed by the equation of Φ= L x I. Therefore I have to prove two equations are the function of the 3rd positive EMF, to prove the second order time derivative of magnetic flux, d2Φ/dt2 is the function of the 3rd positive EMF. The first equation is the second order time derivative of inductance L. the equation is expressed d2L /dt2. The second equation is the second order time derivative of current I. it is expressed d2I/dt2. So the 3rd positive EMF should be the function of these two terms. The former term d2L/dt2 was verified on the paper of NASA conference, ref. (2). The latter term d2I/dt2 was verified on the paper of ref. (5). The first result of this paper is the replication of ref. (5) by many times scaling up. The second result of the paper was unexpected and the most significant. The capacitor charge increased 6.60 times of initial charge of the capacitor after the discharging. The measuring data of the discharging current shows clearly long lasting discharging time beyond 250μsec. Although the capacitor discharging stopped at 6μsec after the discharging started. In other words, although even after the power source for the capacitor voltage became zero at 6μsec, the discharging current was still keeping to flow for more than 250μsec. The circuit current was remaining after the voltage of the power source was zero. Where did the extra charge and voltage come from?
However, the consideration of this phenomenon is not written on the paper. I suppose the spark discharging is the cause of the phenomenon. The long lasting discharging current might be flowed by the different type of the positive EMF caused by the electrical spark.The result ...